#archlinux-ports | Logs for 2025-12-02

Back
[01:25:54] -!- Daanct12 has joined #archlinux-ports
[04:34:39] -!- hcmb_ has joined #archlinux-ports
[04:34:39] -!- hcmb has quit [Killed (erbium.libera.chat (Nickname regained by services))]
[04:34:39] hcmb_ is now known as hcmb
[05:09:53] -!- solsTiCe8 has joined #archlinux-ports
[05:11:35] -!- solsTiCe has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds]
[05:11:35] solsTiCe8 is now known as solsTiCe
[05:28:29] -!- marmis has quit [Quit: Bye!]
[05:30:10] -!- marmis has joined #archlinux-ports
[06:05:20] -!- slainsavage has joined #archlinux-ports
[06:14:30] <slainsavage> solskogen|M: good morning, the MR was merged yesterday for dbeaver
[06:14:59] <Daanct12> morning
[06:34:08] <slainsavage> Daanct12: morning, hows your day going so far
[06:34:55] <slainsavage> Plan is to start taking a look at gstreamer today and do some more work on the documentaion
[06:36:55] -!- solsTiCe has quit [Ping timeout: 240 seconds]
[06:40:44] <Daanct12> eeeeeh it's okay
[06:40:57] <Daanct12> i wonder if arch will get rv32ima port
[06:41:14] <Daanct12> (where are all the risc-v users)
[06:43:24] <slainsavage> I don't have a risc-v device yet, but one day I will get one
[06:44:00] -!- solsTiCe has joined #archlinux-ports
[06:44:31] <slainsavage> It would be so cool if Raspberry releases a risc-v board
[08:21:25] <linkmauve> bschnei, with waypipe you can run graphical programs on headless boards, displaying them on your local computer.
[08:23:03] <linkmauve> slainsavage, they did release a microcontroller.
[08:23:39] <linkmauve> But they’re also basically just a Broadcom reseller.
[08:24:56] <slainsavage> linkmauve: yup, the rp2040 is a pretty nice micro controller
[08:26:01] <Daanct12> hi linkmauve
[08:26:40] <slainsavage> I normally use the esp32's or the rp2040 depending on what I require
[08:26:53] <Daanct12> slainsavage: i was asking for rv32ima port because i have this https://social.treehouse.systems
[08:26:54] <phrik> Title: Danct12: &quot;it boots! i eventually got bored with the counter…&quot; - Treehouse Mastodon (at social.treehouse.systems)
[08:27:13] <linkmauve> Daanct12, hi. :)
[08:27:21] <slainsavage> there is the esp32-C3 that is based on risc-v
[08:27:54] <linkmauve> slainsavage, very unlikely to support that ISA revision.
[08:28:41] <Daanct12> linkmauve: the esp32-c3 also doesnt support psram
[08:28:58] <Daanct12> so even if the isa can run linux it will not have enough memory
[08:29:04] <Daanct12> to even boot
[08:33:17] <solskogen|M> slainsavage: Perfect. the package is now uploaded :)
[08:55:06] <solskogen|M> if you want more: itk
[09:20:38] <slainsavage> solskogen|M: are there any other packages that I can look at
[09:21:27] <solskogen|M> linux-tools :-)
[09:21:57] <slainsavage> is it a compile problem as well or something else
[09:22:12] <jelle> it was discussed here a while back
[09:22:41] <jelle> its more complicated then a compile problem
[09:23:01] <solskogen|M> no, it's about getting the right tools for it. the current pkgbuild focuses on x86_64 (strange enough)
[09:23:12] <jelle> strange enough?
[09:23:24] <solskogen|M> it was a joke :-)
[09:24:12] <slainsavage> any chance of getting a quick outline of the problem before I start
[09:24:30] <slainsavage> are there any other low hanging fruit
[09:24:33] <jelle> slainsavage: the pkgbuild ships slit packages which only apply to x86_64
[09:25:03] <slainsavage> jelle: thanks
[09:25:17] <jelle> arch does not have a way to say this pacakge is x86_64 only as far as I know
[09:26:29] <slainsavage> who are the people working on aarch64 port.
[09:26:45] <Daanct12> i believe it was one guy solskogen|M
[09:26:50] <Daanct12> or one person*
[09:27:02] <Daanct12> apologies
[09:27:06] <jelle> there are multiple :)
[09:27:12] <solskogen|M> we're three, but I'm doing most of the package building
[09:27:19] <Daanct12> ah
[09:27:59] <slainsavage> solskogen|M: are you a ArchLinux maintainer / developer ?
[09:28:08] <solskogen|M> that is, we're the ones having access to the build machine. everyone who contributes to making a package build (and work!) is a part of it. even if you know it or not :-)
[09:28:15] <solskogen|M> slainsavage: No
[09:30:38] <slainsavage> I assume the plan is to get a RFC done at some point for aarch64
[09:30:42] <solskogen|M> I'm just a normal guy, wanting Arch to have a official aarch64 port - and was fed up with the state of ALARM.
[09:31:32] <slainsavage> that is pretty much how I feel as well, I would love for aarch64 to be supported in Arch Linux